For Senate 4/1/05
Passed 4/1/05
Resolution Concerning “Open Access”
From the Committee on Libraries and Academic
Computing
WHEREAS the Senate is empowered
by University statutes §23 (c) and (e) to “work for the advancement of academic
freedom... [and]
initiate and review policies to govern the University’s relations with
outside agencies for research, instruction, and related purposes,” and
WHEREAS the principle of open
access to the fruits of scholarly research is increasingly being adopted and
pursued by universities and in the scholarly community at large, and
WHEREAS Columbia University
continues to be in the forefront of open-access endeavors, through its advocacy
activities and its digital library programs, and
WHEREAS technological, legal and
economic barriers continue to be erected to obstruct or limit open access, and
WHEREAS the availability of the
fruits of scholarly endeavor ought to reflect the conditions of cooperative
endeavor and common resources under which scholarly work is produced,
Therefore BE IT RESOLVED
1. That the Senate put on record its support for the principle of open access to the
fruits of scholarly research;
2. That the Senate urge the
University to advance new models for scholarly publishing that will promote
open access, helping to reshape the marketplace in which scholarly ideas
circulate, in a way that is consistent with standards of peer review and
scholarly excellence;
3. That the Senate urge the
University to monitor and resist efforts to impose digital rights management
regimes and technologies that obstruct or limit open access, except as
necessary to secure rights of privacy;
4.
That the Senate urge the scholars of Columbia University to play a part in
these open-access endeavors in their various capacities as authors, readers,
editors, referees, and members of scientific boards and learned associations
etc., (a) by encouraging and collaborating with publishers’ efforts to advance
open access, (b) by retaining intellectual property rights in their own work
where this will help it become more widely available, and (c) by remaining
alert to efforts by publishers to impose barriers on access to the fruits of
scholarly research.