Draft -- Annual Review of the Education Committee (2009-2010)
The committee completed its usual meeting schedule of eight monthly meetings, in addition to a joint meeting with the IT and Libraries Committees.
While much of the work of the committee involves reviews of new program proposals and surveys of recently approved programs, the committee also informed itself on the progress in the conversion of CourseWorks to the Sakai platform and the planned introduction of the new CourseWorks Packit service, which will allow the students to assemble course materials of completed courses into a downloadable package that can be kept for future use.
Finally, a substantial amount of committee time and effort was spent on the cyclical problem of the academic calendar in years with a late Labor Day and a shortened Fall semester.
Reviews of proposals for new educational programs
Among the regular duties of the committee is the review of proposals for new programs that are received from the Provost’s office. Each proposal is assigned to a subcommittee for review and a recommendation to the full committee. The Education Committee approved the following proposals and presented resolutions for their approval by the Senate:
Action was deferred on one program proposal, which was subsequently withdrawn.
Action is pending on a program proposal, which is under subcommittee review (Joint JD/MBA).
Two requests for Departmental name changes were received during this academic year. A subcommittee reviewed both proposals, which were reviewed subsequently the entire committee. Both Department Chairs were invited to provide additional information in support of their proposals.
The following name changes were submitted to the Senate and approved (2/26/2010):
A proposal to change the Center for Human Rights to the Institute for Human Rights was reviewed and approved by the Senate (12/4/2009).
The Education Committee invited several guests to provide additional insight and background information on the following:
The committee, with the cooperation of the Senior Vice Provost’s office, surveys new programs five years after their approval by the Senate. The survey is intended to assist the committee in determining whether a program has been implemented as originally proposed, whether it has met its purpose, and how many students have applied and matriculated. When applicable, the number and placement of graduates is considered as well. The survey is analyzed by a subcommittee composed of three education committee members
Finally, the Committee wishes to acknowledge with appreciation the continued interest and wholehearted participation of Anna Longobardo, Trustee Emerita, in the work of the Committee.
James H. Applegate